Decentralized Peer Review Marketplace with Cardano & Next.js

Decentralized Peer Review Marketplace with Cardano & Next.js

Introduction

Peer review in academia is fundamentally broken — slow, biased, unrewarding. Journals act as gatekeepers, while reviewers receive nothing for their efforts. We’ve seen too many promising papers stuck in limbo.

So we built something better: a peer-to-peer review marketplace, powered by Cardano and Next.js, where authors post papers and reviewers earn tokens for meaningful feedback. No middlemen. Transparent incentives. Real accountability.

We’re not here to reinvent academia — just to fix its worst bottleneck.

Environment Setup

Backend Stack:

  • Cardano Testnet via Blockfrost
  • Plutus Lite Scripts for token escrow
  • Lucid.js for smart contract interactions
  • IPFS + web3.storage to store paper metadata and review documents

Frontend Stack:

  • Next.js 14 (App Router)
  • TailwindCSS for sleek UI
  • Wagmi + Lucid to connect Cardano wallets (e.g. Nami Wallet)
  • Simple Node.js Proxy for:
    • CORS handling
    • Request timestamping

Deployment:

  • Local Dev: Mac + Ubuntu
  • Cloud: Vercel
  • Token: Dummy reviewToken minted on testnet

Workflow Overview

Author Flow:

  1. Upload paper (CID via IPFS)
  2. Set bounty (e.g. 100 reviewTokens)
  3. Paper appears on the public marketplace dashboard

Reviewer Flow:

  1. Claim a paper
  2. Write markdown-based feedback
  3. Submit review (CID + signature)
  4. Await author’s confirmation for payout

After Submission:

  • Smart contract verifies workflow
  • Tokens are released upon approval
  • Review and rating stored off-chain (linked to wallet)

Smart Contract Logic

  • Token Escrow: Bounty is locked until conditions are met
  • Review Confirmation: Author must approve review to trigger payout
  • Timeout Mechanism: 7-day lock; if expired without submission, tokens are returned
  • Dispute Flag: Allows manual overrides or review blocking (v1 implementation)

Dashboard Features (Next.js)

  • List open bounties with filters (topic, reward, deadline)
  • Connect wallet (Nami) with persistent session
  • Upload preprints (CID, title, abstract)
  • Inline markdown editor for reviews
  • Track review status and past payouts
  • Display reviewer reputation and earnings

Reviewer Experience

  • Claiming a paper locks it for 7 days
  • Clean markdown interface for writing
  • Preview pane for formatted view
  • Simple submit button — sends CID and wallet signature
  • Payout automatically triggered on approval

Author Experience

  • Dashboard to track review progress
  • Approve or reject submissions
  • View reviewer’s historical ratings
  • Flag disputes if necessary

Extra Features

  • Reputation System: Based on average ratings from last 10 reviews
  • Token Faucet: For testnet access
  • Notifications: Toasts for major actions (connected, claimed, payout)
  • Audit Trail: Timestamp + transaction hashes logged
  • Anti-Spam:
    • 1 active review per reviewer
    • Minimum token requirement for bounties
    • Markdown sanitation + CID rotation for edits

Test Results

  • 3 papers submitted
  • 5 reviews completed
  • All payouts processed within 15 seconds
  • Wallet integrations smooth
  • 1 missed deadline → tokens refunded automatically

Best Practices

  • Store only CIDs on-chain to keep contracts lean
  • Sanitize all markdown inputs
  • Keep reputation logic off-chain, but tied to verified wallet
  • Monitor and retrain smart contract logic as needed
  • Limit spam through active review caps and token minimums
  • Prepare for DAO-based governance in future iterations

Read more about tech blogs . To know more about and to work with industry experts visit internboot.com .

Conclusion

The decentralized peer review marketplace performed far better than expected.

Reviewers finally got rewarded. Authors didn’t wait months. The system ran smoothly on Cardano testnet, and Next.js kept the UI fast and user-friendly. No gas fees. No complex infrastructure.

Next steps? DAO curation, reviewer badges, and group review modes. Academic gatekeepers may not love it — but for the open research community, this could be a quiet revolution.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *